ARCS Model and Educational Neuroscience: A Transformative Approach for Integrated English and STEM Teaching
Keywords:
STEM, English language teaching, educational neuroscience, ARCS model, instructional design, integrated learningAbstract
Context: The integration of English language teaching with STEM disciplines has gained traction as an innovative approach to enhance learning and prepare students for future challenges. Objective: To propose a framework based on the ARCS model (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) for designing educational programs that effectively integrate English language teaching and STEM disciplines, considering the principles of educational neuroscience. Method: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in academic databases, applying filters to include only relevant studies. A thematic analysis was performed to identify patterns and recurring themes. Results: Strategies and concrete examples for applying the ARCS model in integrated English and STEM teaching are presented, supported by neuroscientific principles. Success cases and challenges reported in the literature are highlighted. Conclusion: The ARCS model, backed by educational neuroscience, provides a solid framework for designing programs that integrate English language teaching and STEM disciplines, promoting motivating, meaningful, and long-lasting learning.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001
Chang, Y., Song, A., & Fang, R. (2018). Integrating ARCS Model of Motivation and PBL in Flipped Classroom: a Case Study on a Programming Language. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/97187
Chen, X., Geva, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2020). Integrating English language learning and STEM education: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09846-4
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dichter, G. S., Damiano, C. A., & Allen, J. A. (2012). Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: Animal models and clinical findings. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-19
Feng, S., & Tuan, H. (2005). Using ARCS Model to Promote 11th Graders' Motivation and Achievement in Learning about Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-004-6828-7
Hallström, J., & Schönborn, K. J. (2019). Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: Reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_suppl), 344S-367S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669780
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kim, B. (2020). A Study of the Effects of Keller's ARCS Motivational Model on Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement in Business Major English Class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.213
Köster, M., Castel, J., Gruber, T., & Kärtner, J. (2018). Visual cortical networks align with behavioral measures of self-regulation in early childhood. NeuroImage, 173, 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.055
Li, K., & Keller, J. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Comput. Educ., 122, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019
Martins, M. D., & Fortunato, I. (2017). Neuroscience applied to education: A literature review. Psicologia da Educação, (44), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5935/2175-3520.20170001
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
Moreira, M. A., & Santos, L. P. (2019). A utilização do modelo ARCS de motivação no ensino de Física: um estudo de caso. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 41(4), e20190031. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2019-0031
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018). CLIL and educational level: A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on language outcomes. Porta Linguarum, (29), 51-70. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54029
Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052
Reynolds, K., Roberts, L., & Hauck, J. (2017). Exploring motivation: integrating the ARCS model with instruction. Reference Services Review, 45, 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0057
Roemintoyo, R., Zeyn, C., Nurhidayanti, A., & Budiarto, M. (2022). Implementation of the ARCS Learning Model and Building Component Teaching Aids to Improve Learning Outcomes of State Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.21608/ihites.2021.103005.1065
Santos, W. L. P., & Mortimer, E. F. (2019). Abordagem de aspectos sociocientíficos em aulas de ciências: possibilidades e limitações. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 14(2), 191-218. https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/355
Saputri, K., Santosa, S., & Indrayani, A. (2020). EFFECTIVENESS MODEL ARCS (ATTENTION, RELEVANCE, CONFIDENCE, AND SATISFACTION) IN LEARNING PROCESS TO INCREASE LEARNING MOTIVATION. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 03, 268-273. https://ijessr.com/uploads2020/ijessr_03_306.pdf
Sekeres, M. J., Bonasia, K., St-Laurent, M., Pishdadian, S., Winocur, G., Grady, C., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Recovering and preventing loss of detailed memory: Differential rates of forgetting for detail types in episodic memory. Learning & Memory, 23(2), 72-82. https://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/23/2/72.full.pdf
Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Thomas, M. S. C., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. P. (2019). Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide for educators, parents, and policymakers. W.W. Norton & Company.
Tüysüz, M., Yıldırım, B., & Demirci, N. (2020). What is the motivation difference between university students and high school students? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 1031-1044. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13165a
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Velásquez, C. A. G., Ballen, D. F. R., & Rodríguez, A. Z. G. (2021). Diseño de material didáctico desde los principios de la neuroeducación. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12746
Woo, J.-C. (2014). Digital Game-Based Learning Supports Student Motivation, Cognitive Success, and Performance Outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 291-307. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.3.291
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sandro Xavier Quintuña Padilla, Verónica Alexandra Herrera Caldas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Voces de América y el Caribe adheres to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 license. Under this license, others are allowed to remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. Their new works must be under an identical license as the one that covers the original work. For more details on this license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
By publishing in our journal, authors agree to these conditions where others may share, use and adapt their work, as long as it is done non-commercially and with proper attribution given to the original work published in Voces de América y el Caribe.
