Modelo ARCS y neurociencia educativa: Enfoque transformador para la enseñanza integrada de inglés y STEM
Palabras clave:
STEM, enseñanza del inglés, neurociencia educativa, modelo ARCS, diseño instruccional, aprendizaje integradoResumen
Contexto: La integración de la enseñanza del inglés con las disciplinas STEM ha ganado terreno como un enfoque innovador para potenciar el aprendizaje y formar a los estudiantes para enfrentar los desafíos venideros. Objetivo: Proponer un marco fundamentado en el modelo ARCS (Atención, Relevancia, Confianza y Satisfacción) para diseñar programas educativos que integren efectivamente la enseñanza del inglés y las disciplinas STEM, considerando los principios de la neurociencia educativa. Método: Se revisó exhaustivamente la literatura en bases de datos académicas, aplicando filtros para incluir solo estudios pertinentes. Se realizó un análisis temático para identificar patrones y temas recurrentes. Resultados: Se presentan estrategias y ejemplos concretos para aplicar el modelo ARCS en la enseñanza integrada de inglés y STEM, respaldados por principios neurocientíficos. Se destacan casos de éxito y desafíos reportados en la literatura. Conclusión: El modelo ARCS, respaldado por la neurociencia educativa, ofrece un marco sólido para diseñar programas que integren la enseñanza del inglés y las disciplinas STEM, promoviendo un aprendizaje motivador, significativo y duradero.
Descargas
Referencias
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001
Chang, Y., Song, A., & Fang, R. (2018). Integrating ARCS Model of Motivation and PBL in Flipped Classroom: a Case Study on a Programming Language. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/97187
Chen, X., Geva, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2020). Integrating English language learning and STEM education: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09846-4
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dichter, G. S., Damiano, C. A., & Allen, J. A. (2012). Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: Animal models and clinical findings. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-19
Feng, S., & Tuan, H. (2005). Using ARCS Model to Promote 11th Graders' Motivation and Achievement in Learning about Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-004-6828-7
Hallström, J., & Schönborn, K. J. (2019). Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: Reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_suppl), 344S-367S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216669780
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kim, B. (2020). A Study of the Effects of Keller's ARCS Motivational Model on Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement in Business Major English Class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.2.213
Köster, M., Castel, J., Gruber, T., & Kärtner, J. (2018). Visual cortical networks align with behavioral measures of self-regulation in early childhood. NeuroImage, 173, 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.055
Li, K., & Keller, J. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Comput. Educ., 122, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019
Martins, M. D., & Fortunato, I. (2017). Neuroscience applied to education: A literature review. Psicologia da Educação, (44), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5935/2175-3520.20170001
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
Moreira, M. A., & Santos, L. P. (2019). A utilização do modelo ARCS de motivação no ensino de Física: um estudo de caso. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 41(4), e20190031. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2019-0031
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018). CLIL and educational level: A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on language outcomes. Porta Linguarum, (29), 51-70. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54029
Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052
Reynolds, K., Roberts, L., & Hauck, J. (2017). Exploring motivation: integrating the ARCS model with instruction. Reference Services Review, 45, 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0057
Roemintoyo, R., Zeyn, C., Nurhidayanti, A., & Budiarto, M. (2022). Implementation of the ARCS Learning Model and Building Component Teaching Aids to Improve Learning Outcomes of State Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.21608/ihites.2021.103005.1065
Santos, W. L. P., & Mortimer, E. F. (2019). Abordagem de aspectos sociocientíficos em aulas de ciências: possibilidades e limitações. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 14(2), 191-218. https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/355
Saputri, K., Santosa, S., & Indrayani, A. (2020). EFFECTIVENESS MODEL ARCS (ATTENTION, RELEVANCE, CONFIDENCE, AND SATISFACTION) IN LEARNING PROCESS TO INCREASE LEARNING MOTIVATION. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 03, 268-273. https://ijessr.com/uploads2020/ijessr_03_306.pdf
Sekeres, M. J., Bonasia, K., St-Laurent, M., Pishdadian, S., Winocur, G., Grady, C., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Recovering and preventing loss of detailed memory: Differential rates of forgetting for detail types in episodic memory. Learning & Memory, 23(2), 72-82. https://learnmem.cshlp.org/content/23/2/72.full.pdf
Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Thomas, M. S. C., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. P. (2019). Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide for educators, parents, and policymakers. W.W. Norton & Company.
Tüysüz, M., Yıldırım, B., & Demirci, N. (2020). What is the motivation difference between university students and high school students? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 1031-1044. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13165a
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Velásquez, C. A. G., Ballen, D. F. R., & Rodríguez, A. Z. G. (2021). Diseño de material didáctico desde los principios de la neuroeducación. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12746
Woo, J.-C. (2014). Digital Game-Based Learning Supports Student Motivation, Cognitive Success, and Performance Outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 291-307. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.3.291
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Sandro Xavier Quintuña Padilla, Verónica Alexandra Herrera Caldas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Voces de América y el Caribe se adherida a la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0. Bajo esta licencia, otros pueden remezclar, retocar y crear a partir de su trabajo con fines no comerciales, siempre y cuando le atribuyan el crédito de la creación original. Sus nuevas obras deben estar bajo una licencia idéntica a la que cubre la obra original. Para más detalles sobre esta licencia, visite https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es.
Al publicar en nuestra revista, los autores aceptan estas condiciones donde otros pueden compartir, uso y adaptar su trabajo, siempre que se realice sin fines comerciales y se otorgue el crédito correspondiente a la obra publicada originalmente en Voces de América y el Caribe
